[BUG/Gpgme] checking message with a revoked key

Albrecht Dreß albrecht.dress at arcor.de
Fri May 21 14:00:07 CEST 2004

Am 21.05.04 01:05 schrieb(en) Marcus Brinkmann:
> The invalid engine is caused by a VALIDSIG without starting a
> signature (as REVKEYSIG was not recognized).  Can you try the below
> patch if it helps?  It's totally untested (didn't even try to compile
> it).

Wow - great patch!! Now op_verify correctly returns with no error, writes  
back the "decrypted" contents, and the signature status says "certificate  
revoked". Good work!!

> BTW, the CERT_REVOKED error code in the patch is probably bogus.  From
> a quick glance, I agree with you that a KEY_REVOKED error code is
> needed in gpg-error.

Now I'm looking eagerly forward to a new gpgme/gpg-error tarball 2B  
released soon, so I can feed the fix and the new key status/error upstream  
into balsa... ;-))



 Albrecht Dreß  -  Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13  -  D-53123 Bonn (Germany)
       Phone (+49) 228 6199571  -  mailto:albrecht.dress at arcor.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040521/bc70292d/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list