Bug report

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Sun Feb 13 17:41:11 CET 2005

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:32:25 +1100, James Fleming said:

> gpg: Ohhhh jeeee: ... this is a bug (g10.c:1758:main)
> secmem usage: 0/0 bytes in 0/0 blocks of pool 0/32768
> Aborted

Okay, that is due to:

#if defined(HAVE_GETUID) && defined(HAVE_GETEUID)
    /* There should be no way to get to this spot while still carrying
       setuid privs.  Just in case, bomb out if we are. */

> The configure options used were:
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/pkgs/gnupg-1.4.0 --enable-m-guard
> --enable-selinux-support --with-capabilities

Seems that there are changes in the capability system of 2.6 compared
to older kernels.



More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list