alon.barlev at gmail.com
Tue Sep 6 20:12:53 CEST 2005
'Lionel Elie Mamane' wrote:
> I find the following argument very reasonable: I have no interest in
implementing PKCS#11 and nobody has stepped up to pay me to do it.
When I started this discussion, I wanted to ask whether implementing a
feature of gpg-agent to access PKCS#11 token is in the roadmap... I will
gladly get the answer, yes... If someone will pay for the implementation...
When you raise this issue... It seems that PKCS#11 is not implemented not
because of licensing problems... But because if PKCS#11 will be implemented
then there will be no work to be done for each specific card...
More information about the Gnupg-devel