alphasigmax at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 13:39:05 CEST 2005
Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Alphax <alphasigmax at gmail.com> writes:
>>Zeljko Vrba wrote:
>>>Joe Smith wrote:
>>>>For example, your CA can revoke your key leaving you with one key that
>>>>is invalid X.509, but valid OpenPGP? Yuck!
>>>Using the X.509 cert and OpenPGP public key (having the same private
>>>key) could be useful in the following scenario:
>>Is that even allowed??
> SPENGLER (emphatic): Don't cross PGP and X.509.
> VENKMAN: Why not?
> SPENGLER: Trust me. It will be bad.
> VENKMAN: What do you mean "bad?"
> SPENGLER: It's hard to explain, but try to imagine Werner appearing suddenly
> and beating you to death with a large copy of the GNU manifesto.
> VENKMAN (with military authority): That's it! No X.509. You guys are
Wait, where's Richard Stallman in all of this? :)
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
More information about the Gnupg-devel