x509 v1 certificate

Kazu Yamamoto ( 山本和彦 ) kazu at iij.ad.jp
Mon Sep 25 16:44:43 CEST 2006

> Isn't that the company who once issue a certificate for MICROS0FT.COM :-)

I don't understand what's point here.

Some authors of RFC 3280 belongs to versign. Why did they have to 
write RFC3280 which make their certificates invalid? 

It seems to me that it is not the case. They wrote RFC3280 so as their
certificates are all valid and unfortunately Section 4 is mis-leading


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list