DSA2

[Robert J. Hansen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Werner Koch wrote:
> So there is a noticable performance gain for SHA256 (except for the
> first one which might be a caching issue) 

Given the difference is just a handful of milliseconds for a 1mb file,
and most of the data I send is at most a few k, I feel safe in repeating
my assertion that for my usage profile SHA512 meets my usability and
performance goals.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJFGjkDAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJ/dcIAJg9iVmDFgoy/mvOu+AcJTSZ
cA52WBGDYABdk3EOEygYRLlssAVWeYrxHOSiuYYvpaxUHwzpdDCY21adZJVDIFAd
jAGM04mUblHsdLv12SI64fFuZtI0i/Arin5gIb6rsCRk81splfwwD7CKJic4cuQp
r5XC0ZV7y5CDwBziDAqV1iAkRk8/xSFSj5XnxLjZIcy1z0V4pg+axau3c/g0dZuA
gQcE0Kw5n/DnMbuod0fbDxiIGo1nbtd08TfKBvDWUwzmCbK0ggEFdAwpssOpHrWV
xIqA2U8aOR7lkWFl6sxWEqZ6J2nq/2wu/Q669eWtSlN0ObENPjl+yktQxv4hmEI=
=27Tv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----