Possible GPGME bug

[Marcus Brinkmann]

At Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:37:52 -0400,
"Adam Schreiber" <sadam at clemson.edu> wrote:
> 
> In fixing a bug in Seahorse, I found that our feature to revoke a sub
> key was no longer working.  It uses the gpgme_op_edit API.  I checked
> the challenge and responses of gpg --edit-key manually and found that
> they matched those our state machine expected.

Did you check using the same arguments to gpg for invocation?  GPGME
adds a whole bunch of arguments to the command line (check with ps).

Thanks,
Marcus