combination of text-mode signature (by mutt?) and gpg >= 1.4.8 introduces interoperability problem
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Tue Jul 8 15:02:56 CEST 2008
On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:11 AM, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Just followed up on an email written with mutt 1.5.18
> and signed with gnupg 1.4.9 which I could verify the signature
> with gpg2, but not with gpg1 from Debian Sarge and Etch
> which is 1.4.1 and 1.4.6 with patches respectively.
> My current hypothesis is that the default change
> introduced in gnupg 1.4.8 regarding --no-rfc2440-text
> causes the interoperability problems. From what I have gathered,
> the new setting is --no-rfc2440-text which will not strip
> trailing spaces and tabs.
> So verification with at least 1.4.1 - 1.4.7 fails with default
> settings, if lines with trailing spaces and tabs are left in
> unquoted by the MTA.
> As the email came from mutt 1.5.18, I could observe that trailing
> spaces were left in, in an message/rfc822 part.
> (Note that quoted-printable or base64 is forbidden in those parts.)
> Mutt could have stripped the spaces in this case before calculating
> the hash, but did not and this is hard to decide, because any
> part might contain another signature.
Can you clarify a bit more what you are seeing? I think if there was
a general problem here we would have heard screaming from many
sources. Since you're the first person reporting it here, I wonder if
there is something more subtle going on.
* Are you sure the sending MUA is mutt 1.5.18? (The subject line says
"by mutt?" which suggests you're not sure).
* What is the receiving MUA? (the one which calls GPG to verify the
* Was this message sent OpenPGP/MIME or something else? Clearsigned?
An old-style armored blob containing the content plus appended
signature? There are (alas) many ways to send a signed mail.
If you can send me the message in question, that would be ideal. In
mutt, do a ":set mbox_type=mbox", save the message to a file, tar the
file to ensure that nothing will mess about with line endings in
transit, and send me the tarball. If the message is sensitive and
should not be seen by others, can you ask the sender to create another
message in the same way to send me?
More information about the Gnupg-devel