sendings passwords with gpg-agent? (was Re: gnupg1 still needed?)
marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Tue Jul 22 01:21:20 CEST 2008
At Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:43:25 -0400 (EDT),
mskala at ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > I am not aware of such an option with gpg2, but note that you will
> > never get it in all circumstances. Consider smart cards used on a
> > terminal with a number pad. In this case, you really do not want the
> > pin number to go through the application.
> Being able to decrypt and sign in scripts is pretty important. If gpg2
> can't do that, people will use gpg1 whether you approve or not.
gpg2 can do that. Off the cuff, I can think of about 3-5 ways to do
it. The best method depends on your environment and security needs.
Just to give you a hint, check out the various passphrase related
command line options, the GPGME test suite in SVN, and the
There is nothing wrong with using gpg1. We approve fully.
More information about the Gnupg-devel