GnuPG and Python

[Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Werner Koch wrote:
> FWIW: I don't think that GPGME is overkill. Instead it offers you an
> easy way for better performance because eventually we will implement a
> co-process scheme so that a running gpg process can be used for more
> than one operation.

Yes, with that detail in mind, then going GPGME seems like the best option. Thanks for the insight,
team.

- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman / Arturo Busleiman @ 4:900/107
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html
Mailing List Archives at http://archiver.mailfighter.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJpnXIAlpOsGhXcE0RCngRAJ4rww3yo00lwunA95yajWiRKHRTQACbBMEb
OPtHV4fltrCfgC1teyeReRc=
=4QZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----