laying groundwork for an eventual migration away from SHA1 with gpg
wk at gnupg.org
Wed May 6 20:46:41 CEST 2009
On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:30, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:
> I agree with you that it might give some users the wrong impression
> about the security of the archive, but i'm not sure what a better
> alternative is. Certainly the explicit inclusion of the term
The common wisdom is to use 2048 bit RSA for valuable keys.
> Do you have any suggestions for what to change?
Now that it is in use stick to it. I just couldn't resist to tell what
I am thinking if I see such a key.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel