un-trusting MD5 in gpg
wk at gnupg.org
Thu May 7 10:57:32 CEST 2009
On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:04, dshaw at jabberwocky.com said:
> Blacklist is pretty good. We could call it "blacklist-digests" (which
> gives us a name for "blacklist-ciphers" later). It's reasonably clear
> just from the name.
I agree. That term is different from disabled and may be used with
different semantics in other tools.
I would prefer
The reason is that we do not need a specific order as with
personal-digest-preferences. It makes implementation (cf. gpgconf)
easier and better matches other options related to algorithms.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel