un-trusting MD5 in gpg
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Thu May 7 16:40:36 CEST 2009
On 05/07/2009 04:53 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009 21:31, dshaw at jabberwocky.com said:
>
>> GPG_ERR_DISABLED_CIPHER_ALGO. Calling it "weak" is a value judgement
>> (i.e. weaker than what? too weak for what?) The WEAK_KEY message is
>
> Right. I came to the same conclusion this morning.
Y'all have convinced me that "weak" is a bad term here now. Maybe gpg
should use an error term that points to the option in question?
What about GPG_ERR_BLACKLISTED_DIGEST_ALGO ?
--dkg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 890 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20090507/158f9f01/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list