GnuPG 2.1 beta 3 released

[Veet Vivarto]

sorry my previous message was sent in error. Please disregard.
Thank you.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Veet Vivarto <vivarto at gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps you find this relevant. I don't even begin to see why you are
> interested in this. But who knows.
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:00, nicholas.cole at gmail.com said:
>>
>> > It would be very good if there were still a way to completely 'sandox'
>> (for
>> > want of a better term) an instance of gpg, so that it uses its own key
>> > rings and trust databases.  I certainly find that for testing purposes
>> it
>> > is very useful indeed.  On previous versions --homedir does this nicely.
>>
>> A easy way to do this is:
>>
>>  GNUPGHOME=/foo/bar gpg-agent --daemon sh
>>
>> and then do whatever you want in this shell.  If you are done run give
>> an exit and with a few seconds that gpg-agent will be terminated.  That
>> is how I do almost all tests.
>>
>>
>> Salam-Shalom,
>>
>>   Werner
>>
>> --
>> Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnupg-devel mailing list
>> Gnupg-devel at gnupg.org
>> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20111227/fce1655c/attachment.htm>