Keyserver/security bug 1447 (and 1446 too)

Werner Koch wk at
Tue Dec 4 14:54:47 CET 2012

On Tue,  4 Dec 2012 10:21, gnupg-devel at said:
> If you want to get out of the issue entirely, I recommend taking a look
> at <> and pick one to
> CNAME to.  I suggest "".

Well, that is what I use since 20120619:         86400   IN      CNAME    86400   IN      CNAME

> If you want to avoid tying into SKS and want to maintain closer control

No time to maintain that - I did this in the past but gave up and
switched to a CNAME.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list