ECC and smartcards
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Jan 9 19:20:46 CET 2012
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:57, ott at mirix.org said:
> I'm not against that. Maybe the thing we can take out of this
> discussion is that, the specification should allow multiple curves
> and curve formats to be supported (similar to the RSA key sizes in
> current specification) and perhaps there could be an option „user
> defined“ or something similar which allows you to set the parameters
I has one. You only have to map it to an OID.
> state of X.509 it maybe commercially worthwhile to support the standard
> and the specified profiles required for certain contracts in the future.
For Symantec it makes a lot of sense to support SuiteB. For GnuPG we
don't need to care. Well, unless someone pays for it.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel