fleshing out the XML result of gpgme-tool's KEYLIST command
W. Trevor King
wking at tremily.us
Thu Sep 20 19:13:18 CEST 2012
The current keylist XML of gpgme-tool is not very useful:
S: OK GPGME-Tool 1.3.1-git62bbe58 ready
C: ARMOR true
S: OK
C: KEYLIST 2F73DE2E
S: D key:B2EDBE0E771A4B8708DD16A7511AEDA64332B6E3%0A
S: OK
C: RESULT 2F73DE2E
S: D <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>%0A\x00
S: D <gpgme>%0A\x00
S: D <keylist-result>%0A
S: D <truncated value="0x0" />%0A
S: D </keylist-result>%0A
S: D </gpgme>%0A\x00
S: OK
C: BYE
S: OK closing connection
disconnecting
This is using my gpgme with the INPUT/OUTPUT patch [1], but I haven't
touched the `result_keylist_to_xml` function.
I'd like the result to include all the information about the requested
keys (although it doesn't need to recurse through subkeys). I could
write up a patch to create this XML, but I'd like an estimate of how
likely it would be that the patch would get accepted, considering:
1. My INPUT/OUTPUT patch has been languishing for five months.
2. Deciding on and XML representation for keys may require a lot of
bike-shed-level decisions.
3. Having useful XML would be nice, but is not critical to my pygrader [2].
So perhaps it would be better for me to wait and let someone closer to
the core handle this? I could also let this sit, and bring it up
again in six months when people might have more time…
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel/17104
[2]: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pygrader/
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120920/6f5e8bba/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list