Naming projects in patch subject lines [was: Re: [PATCH] Fix --with-{lib,}gpg-error-prefix.]

Christian Aistleitner christian at
Tue Feb 26 14:29:10 CET 2013

Hi Werner,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:22:15PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> FWIW: If you send a patch, please note somewhere for what project this
> is.

As none of this month's messages on this list follow this convention,
it looks like a new convention to me :-)

What's wrong with the current/old convention of just giving the
project name when it's not gnupg?

Best regards,

---- quelltextlich e.U. ---- \\ ---- Christian Aistleitner ----
                           Companies' registry: 360296y in Linz
Christian Aistleitner
Gruendbergstrasze 65a        Email:  christian at
4040 Linz, Austria           Phone:          +43 732 / 26 95 63
                             Fax:            +43 732 / 26 95 63
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130226/c8f0f809/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list