phrase "UNTRUSTED good signature" is dangerously misleading

Hauke Laging mailinglisten at
Mon Jul 15 01:29:07 CEST 2013

Am So 14.07.2013, 19:36:11 schrieb Nicholas Cole:

> I am not sure whether or not the GnuPG messages need to change.  GnuPG
> itself is often used by people with a good technical knowledge.

That's right but I am afraid that these people tend to consider GnuPG the norm 
and don't know about this discussion.

Would it make sense to have a crypto wording RfC?

Crypto für alle:
OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 572 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130715/50ad5307/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list