file extension confusion: --clearsign makes binary .asc
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Jul 25 17:15:36 CEST 2013
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:05, hans at guardianproject.info said:
> Right, so when you do --clearsign without --armor on a binary file, the
Clearsign always enables the armor option. The sole purpose of
clearsign is to send human readable (aka plain ascii) text using a
simple ascii encapsulation. If you don't feed it with ascii (or utf-8)
you still get the clearsign format. Actually it is not even possible to
use clearsign for non-ascii because the specs demand certain
conversation which are not reversible (line ending, trailing whitespace,
^From).
> How can you use gpg2 or gpgme to detect the contents of a .gpg file? I'm
I'll answer that in another mail.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list