subkey binding signature with no usage flags and/or a critical notation

Werner Koch wk at
Fri Mar 15 20:13:15 CET 2013

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:13, dkg at said:

> I just tested it against 1.4.12, and it works for me:


> sub:u:512:17:24940DE048B80074:1362695370:1365287370:::::sca:
> sub:u:768:17:867E55E65BA8B581:1363119647:1363724447::::::

What do you think:  Should be use '-' to indicate indicate that all-zero
key flags case?  Without that we won't be able to see unknown key flags.

> ^^ this whitespace change in the comments doesn't seem to be relevant or
> necessary to me.

Set margins to 80 and check again ;-)  The line was a little bit too
long, thus I fixed that en passant.

> Do you think it's worth applying the small changeset i suggested earlier
> that allows creation of all-zero usage flag subpacket as well, or is
> that something that we should treat separately?

Please wait two week so you don't need to exchenge legal papers with the
FSF.  And please only for master.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list