subkey binding signature with no usage flags and/or a critical notation
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Fri Mar 15 20:13:15 CET 2013
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:13, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:
> I just tested it against 1.4.12, and it works for me:
Cool.
> sub:u:512:17:24940DE048B80074:1362695370:1365287370:::::sca:
> sub:u:768:17:867E55E65BA8B581:1363119647:1363724447::::::
What do you think: Should be use '-' to indicate indicate that all-zero
key flags case? Without that we won't be able to see unknown key flags.
> ^^ this whitespace change in the comments doesn't seem to be relevant or
> necessary to me.
Set margins to 80 and check again ;-) The line was a little bit too
long, thus I fixed that en passant.
> Do you think it's worth applying the small changeset i suggested earlier
> that allows creation of all-zero usage flag subpacket as well, or is
> that something that we should treat separately?
Please wait two week so you don't need to exchenge legal papers with the
FSF. And please only for master.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list