[PATCH] Allow the user to specify AES256 as well as AES128.
gniibe at fsij.org
Wed May 22 03:08:10 CEST 2013
I think that the feature for stronger encryption scheme for key store
will be nice.
Although it is a story in future for me, I could imagine that some
people using RSA 4096-bit key now (w/ enough entropy for their pass
phrases) would like that, to match its content.
Well, I have a suggestion that it will be better to use SHA-2 of
relevant size, instead of SHA-1. It will be more coherent, then.
I'm not sure if it should be a user option or not. It makes more
sense for me, when GnuPG selects appropriate key store scheme
On 2013-05-21 at 10:34 -0700, Kyle Butt wrote:
> agent/agent.h | 4 +++
> agent/gpg-agent.c | 6 +++-
> agent/protect.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
Please have a look at doc/HACKING for commit log requirement.
Perhaps, you'd like to submit doc/DCO.
More information about the Gnupg-devel