PKCS 12 support questions

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 01:47, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:
>
>> 1) Is there a reason, why minip12 is so limited on supported features?
>
> Because pkcs#12 is an entirely broken design and I did this only on
> customer request for migrating existisng keys.

By the way, what is so broken in pkcs#12 in your opinion? It looks like
encrypted private keys follow the structure that looks like parts of pkcs#12.
80.112.143.48:80
-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry