PKCS 12 support questions
dbaryshkov at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 19:36:19 CET 2014
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 01:47, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:
>> 1) Is there a reason, why minip12 is so limited on supported features?
> Because pkcs#12 is an entirely broken design and I did this only on
> customer request for migrating existisng keys.
By the way, what is so broken in pkcs#12 in your opinion? It looks like
encrypted private keys follow the structure that looks like parts of pkcs#12.
With best wishes
More information about the Gnupg-devel