[PATCH] doc: elaborate on --default-cache-ttl and --max-cache-ttl
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Wed Oct 29 17:35:05 CET 2014
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:34, iomartin at iomartin.net said:
> I'm not sure I'm following you here. On agent/cache.c, the declaration
> of struct cache_item_s is
That one is for the internal API. The command line optiosn are a
different thing. Actually, I just pushed a patch which checks the
ranges of numerical arguments. With that using -1 is not any long
possible.
> on what situations could we have ttl < 0 then if not with
> default-cache-ttl? Is that what gpg-set-passphrase is for?
For example via cmd_preset_passphrase().
> Do you mean that if you someone wants to have all passphrases to have
> infinite ttl, then they should explicitly use gpg-set-passphrase for all
> of them?
If you want set, you should simply remove the passpharses from the keys.
> Finally, what is the rationale behind max-cache-ttl not allowing
> "infinite"? Afterall, in practice, it could be achieved by setting an
> extremely high value for max-cache-ttl. I'd be happy to work on a patch
Exactly, use something like 0x00ffffff (194 days). There is small bug
lingering in the code if you use a too high value, though.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list