[Pkg-gnupg-maint] Why 2.1 is delayed for so long
Kristian Fiskerstrand
kristian.fiskerstrand at sumptuouscapital.com
Fri Sep 19 20:12:40 CEST 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 09/19/2014 05:27 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 09/19/2014 10:35 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I've packaged the latest beta for gnupg 2.1, with the idea of
>> shipping it in debian experimental,
>
...
>
> I just wanted to say how excited and hopeful i am that we can get
> gpg 2.1 (whether beta or not) into broader testing (and more
> generally wider adoption).
Indeed good news :) FWIW I just bumped from beta783 to beta834 for
Gentoo users as well.
- --
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- ----------------------------
Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
- ----------------------------
Dura necessitas
Necessity is harsh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=MP6s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list