[Pkg-gnupg-maint] Why 2.1 is delayed for so long

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Sun Sep 21 09:59:24 CEST 2014

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 03:09, eric at debian.org said:

>> The question is whether the old dirmnagr is at all useful.  How many are
>> using it to check CRLs or run OCSP checks for X.509?
> Does the new version not support the same operations as the old one?

Yes, it does.  It is actually the same code base which has been changed
to take advantage of code already in gnupg/ and the gpg keyserver
helpers have been merged into it.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list