offline primary keys [was: Re: Why 2.1 is delayed for so long]

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at
Wed Sep 24 04:14:36 CEST 2014

On 09/23/2014 09:03 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I was not proposing a CSA master key, I think that is a horrible idea. 

ftr, when i said C+S+A key, i meant a Certification-capable master key +
a Signing-capable subkey + an Encryption-capable subkey.  I don't know
why i wrote A instead of E, sorry for the confusion.  I did not mean to
suggest that all those capabilities should be on the primary key.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20140923/debc294b/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list