Proposal: New keydb format

[Neal H. Walfield]

Hi Guilhem,

At Sun, 01 Nov 2015 21:51:40 +0100,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Sun, 1 Nov 2015 19:49:06 +0100,
> Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 at 01:58:00 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > > At Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:28:28 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > >> Care to look into that?  I'd be happy to resume the benchmark later.
> > > 
> > > I spent a little bit of time on this this evening and found the bug.
> > > I think --with-colons --list-sigs should now work.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot!  Yes indeed it does, and for my use case the performance is just
> > amazing, especially with --list-sigs \o/  See the details below.
> > 
> > However note that in order to create a keyring in keydb format I had to
> > to apply to apply the following patch.  (But I guess the proper fix
> > would be to remove everything from and including the ¡;¢ at the end of
> > each SQL statement.)
> 
> I applied a patch similar to this to master, but I forgot to apply it
> to the branch.  I'm sorry about that.

I rebased against master and fixed a few bugs including the large
memory use that you reported.  Please get the latest code from the
neal/kdb branch.

Thanks!

Neal