Proposal: New keydb format
Neal H. Walfield
neal at walfield.org
Mon Nov 23 15:15:19 CET 2015
At Sun, 01 Nov 2015 21:51:40 +0100,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Sun, 1 Nov 2015 19:49:06 +0100,
> Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 at 01:58:00 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > > At Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:28:28 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > >> Care to look into that? I'd be happy to resume the benchmark later.
> > >
> > > I spent a little bit of time on this this evening and found the bug.
> > > I think --with-colons --list-sigs should now work.
> > Thanks a lot! Yes indeed it does, and for my use case the performance is just
> > amazing, especially with --list-sigs \o/ See the details below.
> > However note that in order to create a keyring in keydb format I had to
> > to apply to apply the following patch. (But I guess the proper fix
> > would be to remove everything from and including the ¡;¢ at the end of
> > each SQL statement.)
> I applied a patch similar to this to master, but I forgot to apply it
> to the branch. I'm sorry about that.
I rebased against master and fixed a few bugs including the large
memory use that you reported. Please get the latest code from the
More information about the Gnupg-devel