GPG_NAME vs. --gpg2-is-gpg vs. documentation vs. installation
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Mon Apr 4 04:06:56 CEST 2016
On Sat 2016-04-02 09:51:44 -0300, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:33, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:
>> One other confusing option along these lines is PACKAGE_GT -- should
>> PACKAGE_GT remain gnupg2?
> It might be confusing but I don't see a real problem that the gettext
> domain is called gnupg2. Changing that would likely create only more
> friction and migration problems.
That's fine with me, and i agree that keeping the two packages quite
distinct from each other in gettext is a good thing.
More information about the Gnupg-devel