Handling a TOFU conflict
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Dec 8 19:36:00 CET 2016
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:34, neal at walfield.org said:
> reasoned argument. (If there was one please point me to it.)
Aside from discussions here, we discussed this in person, on ohone, and
on jabber several times. I know that you write a paper where you argued
that protecting against homograph is important. I do not share this
view, though. What seems to be a homograph to one person it is a
plausible different entity to another person.
> Then we'll have to disagree. I would honestly and sincerely like to
> hear what you think TOFU is trying to protect against.
To detect and warn about a different key with the same mail address.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20161208/064a7800/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list