Problems with pip install gpg

Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson bre at
Wed Dec 21 19:39:10 CET 2016

My point was that if the bindings were more accessible to developers,
developers would be more likely to use them. You guys are really close, but
your pip package could use some work to that end.

I don't understand why I'm getting pushback here. Neal and DKG both asked
me to send this to the list so it wouldn't get forgotten.

- Bjarni

On 21 Dec 2016 19:32, "Werner Koch" <wk at> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:18, bre at said:
> > $ apt-cache rdepends python-gpg |grep '^ ' |wc -l
> > E: No packages found
> > 0
> That is because Python folks tend to write their own binding.  I have
> seen many of them - including Mailpile.
> I somewhat lost the context - what was your point?  That the new gpgme
> python bindings are not yet in widespread use?  You can't seriously
> claiming that given that we released them only 3 months ago.
> Salam-Shalom,
>    Werner
> --
> Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20161221/990f5e18/attachment.html>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list