Request for Discussion: new/PubKeyDistributionConcept/FallbackServer
wk at gnupg.org
Tue Jun 14 17:14:27 CEST 2016
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:29, neal at walfield.org said:
> So, no, WKD is not add a "medium" amount of validity to the key. In
I fully agree.
> Note: it would be possible to save this scheme if we augmented WKD
> with something like Coniks , but Werner doesn't like this, because
> it adds complexity and will take too much time to implement and we
Nope, I like it but know how hard it will be to deploy certificate
transparency for offline protocols out of the blue.
First things first: we need to tackle the problem that keyservers are
not anymore useful to find the key for a given mail address. Thus we
need to _deploy_ a system for reliable key discovery. Then, while the
TLAs are busy locating budgets for mass intrusion into computers, we
start to deploy a monitoring system to detect malicious mail providers.
And we need to hope that on the political edge data sabotage by TLAs
will be prevented.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
/* EFH in Erkrath: https://alt-hochdahl.de/haus */
More information about the Gnupg-devel