browser-socket was

[Werner Koch]

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:02, bertrand at jacquin.bzh said:

> browser-socket, as you said it's not even documented, but I'm
> wondering what is the goal of this option and it has any support by

It is the same as --extra-socket but shows a different message in the
Pinentry.  The idea is to allow a browser to use gpg-agent.  This can be
accomplished by changing openpgp.js by diverting secret key operations
to gpg-agent via a not yet written Native-Messaging-to-Assuan connector
tool.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160920/8720dea5/attachment.sig>