WKS - Inconsistency in RFC-Draft

[Werner Koch]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:19, patrick at enigmail.net said:
> Hi Werner
>
> in the WKS draft [1], you specify in section 4.3 that the confirmation
> request must have the content-type "application/vnd.gnupg.wkd". In the
> examples at the end, you use the content-type
> "application/vnd.gnupg.wks" (note the difference in the last letter).

wk*s* is correct.  I'll fix it for the next version.  Thanks.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170216/a60f64a0/attachment.sig>