WKS - Inconsistency in RFC-Draft

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Thu Feb 16 17:41:44 CET 2017

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:19, patrick at enigmail.net said:
> Hi Werner
> in the WKS draft [1], you specify in section 4.3 that the confirmation
> request must have the content-type "application/vnd.gnupg.wkd". In the
> examples at the end, you use the content-type
> "application/vnd.gnupg.wks" (note the difference in the last letter).

wk*s* is correct.  I'll fix it for the next version.  Thanks.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170216/a60f64a0/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list