cv25519 scalar byte order
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Apr 9 18:53:53 CEST 2018
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:24, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:
>> That would be incorrect. The prefix (e.g. 0x40) indicates a _point_
>> format and not the format of a scalar. Thus skey MAY not have this
> what does this "MAY NOT" mean? if this is an attempt at RFC 2119
> language, i don't understand it. Do you mean "MUST NOT" ?
I was thinking SHOULD NOT but indeed it MUST be MUST NOT.
> What steps are needed to clarify the documentation here so that we can
> have interoperable implementations?
I can't remember an open issue regaring this in the WG. Should be
handled there anyway,
# Please read: Daniel Ellsberg - The Doomsday Machine #
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-devel