[PATCH] doc: Note pinentry-mode for passphrase opts

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Thu Jan 11 14:54:14 CET 2018

On Thu 2018-01-11 09:51:02 +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:12:51PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> PS I'm seeing a "bad signature" from you on the received e-mails
>>    that include these patches.  i dunno whether that's something you
>>    want to debug, but i'm happy to try to diagnose it with you
>>    off-list if you would find that useful.
> Really?  Both of those emails came up as "good signatures" for me,
> albeit with the usual warnings that identity couldn't be confirmed

thanks to Ben and Neal for the feedback, i'm now tracking the problem in
a local toolchain -- I can confirm that i have at least one set of tools
that does verify andre's signature correctly.  I can follow up on list
here if folks are interested once i've got a proper diagnosis.

> because I haven't signed or trusted Andre's key, but other than that
> it seemed fine.

(nitpick: you should never need to "trust" Andre's key to verify
signatures from it!  i think you just mean that neither you nor anyone
that you trust has directly certified Andre's key)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20180111/6f38e27e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list