[PATCH gnupg] man page grammar

Ben McGinnes ben at adversary.org
Wed Mar 7 00:17:05 CET 2018


On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:32:31PM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 06/03/18 21:13, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> > -the case that people use the hidden recipients feature to hide there
> > -own encrypt-to key from others.  If oneself has many secret keys this
> > +the case that people use the hidden recipients feature to hide their
> > +own encrypt-to key from others.  If someone has many secret keys this
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make it "If one has many secret
> keys", since it refers to the person using the
> --skip-hidden-recipients option, and not anyone else? Still slightly
> stilted, but I'd consider it more professional than "you".

Yeah, I'll update it and send it through shortly.  Also, after I sent
it I realised the current line isn't just stilted, it is actually
wrong because:

When referring to one's self one must remember that one does include
an apostrophe because one has only one self and thus does not need to
numer one's self.

:D


Regards,
Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20180307/dd6b48b4/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list