Preserving non-central and privacy with a "permission recording keyserver"

[Andrew Gallagher]

On 10/07/2019 00:15, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-devel wrote:
>> In the keep cases the server should be prepared to see another
>> revocation to delete the key.  This is a bit questionable in the "key
>> compromised" case.
> Yes, I see. In this case there shoule be some kind of additional
> confirmation mechanism to avoid abuse.

I don't follow. If a key is compromised, then the keyblock gets deleted.
What's the additional confirmation mechanism for?

-- 
Andrew Gallagher

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20190710/2677ebb0/attachment.sig>