draft fundamental points (pointer) (Re: Standards: IETF WG proposing incompatible despite implementations and objections)

[Bernhard Reiter]

Am Donnerstag 27 April 2023 19:04:02 schrieb Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-devel:
> On 27 Apr 2023, at 16:16, Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> wrote:
> > What would someone, e.g. Bruce,
> > need to do to remove EAX from the current draft?

> Join the IETF openpgp mailing list and say “I propose to remove EAX from
> the current draft”.
[..] 

Thanks for explaining.

[getting drafts and groups to converge again]
> Without some resolution to the fundamental technical sticking point
> (whether GCM should be tolerated) I don’t see a viable landing zone at this
> time.
>
> The relevant thread starts here:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/_SjXfSOOtdy20nhVv79NBsDBJTc/
> , it covers pretty much all the bases.

Again thanks for the pointer, I'll do some reading.

Regards,
Bernhard

-- 
https://intevation.de/~bernhard   +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20230428/cda74e80/attachment-0001.sig>