potential IETF WG incompatibility with GnuPG 2.3

Justus Winter justus at sequoia-pgp.org
Fri Jan 6 16:12:20 CET 2023

(Resent, earlier mail got lost in somewhere in the mail server
configuration jungle.)

Moin Werner :)

Werner Koch via Gnupg-devel <gnupg-devel at gnupg.org> writes:

> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:30, Ingo Klöcker said:
>> That's the mailing list of the WG and not the closed one (with open archive) 
>> used by the DT.

For the record, said archive is here:

I'm not sure why the list has been characterized as closed.  It is true
that you could not self-subscribe, but everyone was able to post to that
list.  We did add people to the design team after its inception
(Jeffrey), and I'm not aware that anyone was denied access to the design
team or the corresponding mailing list.

> And lots of video calls not all covered by the minutes.

I'm saddened that your trust in the process has been shaken.  However,
it is not true that there were design team meetings not covered by
public notes.  In fact, I made a list of every meeting and corresponding


If you think there were meetings not covered by the notes, I'd be
interested to hear which ones you are thinking of.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 519 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20230106/05f0d661/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list