License change for the GPH.
devnull at Karl-Voit.at
Thu Oct 31 12:35:29 CET 2013
* A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:13:10PM +0100, Karl Voit wrote:
>> However, in case it is that outdated as some people wrote, is a
>> completely re-write from scratch an option?
> I think that's certainly an option, and have started thinking about
> an outline:
> I'd love to hear reactions and suggestions.
>From a quick glance at your page, I'd say it is a good structure.
As a side-note: how about thinking about a set of personas. For
example, I would say that users of Outlook with no deep IT knowledge
are our most important target group for GnuPG documentation. With a
persona in this area, you are able to determine whether or not a
certain topic is explained on a suitable level. It's hard to write
concise documentation with no clear image of the typical reader.
All in all, one of the most disturbing things today is the definitive
fact that the NSA, GCHQ, and many more government organizations are
massively terrorizing the freedom of us and the next generations.
More information about the Gnupg-doc