unsuported key algorithm?

[L. Sassaman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:

> 
> > Yes, the manual is missing a lot. I had offered to complete it if I could
> > have the rights to reprint it as an appendix to my upcoming book, but it
> > looks like by doing so I will need to release my book under GPL. Which I
> > won't do...
> 
>  Licence wars aside, post your addendum here and we'll look at it.

Well, that's my point. I am either going to fill in the blanks in the GPH,
or write my own "guide to GnuPG" for the book, not both... so I would need
to be granted the rights to reprint part (I'm only interested in
reprinting the commands/options/usage half) of the GPH before I actually
spent the time working on it, since I am behind schedule as it is.
 
>  I am not sure how the GPL would apply to books, but I'm quite certain
>  that a way [ not involving lia^H^Hawyers ] can be found to accomodate
>  your situation.

Hopefully. Lawyers are irrelevent, however. If Mike doesn't want me
reprinting what he's written, I am not going to do it.


- --Len.

__

L. Sassaman

System Administrator                |  "All of the chaos
Technology Consultant               |   Makes perfect sense..."
icq.. 10735603                      |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi |              --Joe Diffie



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1d (GNU/Linux)
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.

iD8DBQE45VqNPYrxsgmsCmoRAneXAKCjAr2oxu9+bYS6P0nQWhJUo528lQCdFgQg
f0HNFAtVHtH+NbQ+hOLMhps=
=6QUh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----