unsuported key algorithm?

L. Sassaman rabbi@quickie.net
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:10:15 -0800 (PST)

Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:

> > Yes, the manual is missing a lot. I had offered to complete it if I could
> > have the rights to reprint it as an appendix to my upcoming book, but it
> > looks like by doing so I will need to release my book under GPL. Which I
> > won't do...
> Licence wars aside, post your addendum here and we'll look at it.
Well, that's my point. I am either going to fill in the blanks in the GPH, or write my own "guide to GnuPG" for the book, not both... so I would need to be granted the rights to reprint part (I'm only interested in reprinting the commands/options/usage half) of the GPH before I actually spent the time working on it, since I am behind schedule as it is.
> I am not sure how the GPL would apply to books, but I'm quite certain
> that a way [ not involving lia^H^Hawyers ] can be found to accomodate
> your situation.
Hopefully. Lawyers are irrelevent, however. If Mike doesn't want me reprinting what he's written, I am not going to do it. - --Len. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "All of the chaos Technology Consultant | Makes perfect sense..." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Joe Diffie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1d (GNU/Linux) Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE45VqNPYrxsgmsCmoRAneXAKCjAr2oxu9+bYS6P0nQWhJUo528lQCdFgQg f0HNFAtVHtH+NbQ+hOLMhps= =6QUh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----