unsuported key algorithm?

L. Sassaman rabbi@quickie.net
Mon, 3 Apr 2000 05:49:31 -0700 (PDT)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think this has become far off the topic of GnuPG. Werner, feel free to
declare this topic dead if you so choose. :)

I'm wondering about section 7: Aggregation with independent works... does
this mean that, if the GPH were released under the GFDL, that it could be
reprinted as part of a whole, without the whole being released under the
provisions of the GFDL?

I think so...


- --Len.


On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Matt Mozur wrote:


> -----BEGIN PGPENVELOPE PROCESSED MESSAGE-----
>
> "L. Sassaman" wrote:
> >
> > A standard copyright, as with all published books. I don't see how the GPL
> > fits in with the book publishing world...
> >
>
> GNU has released a new license for documents, called GFDL (GNU
> Free
> Documentation License)
>
> you can get it at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
>
> HTH
>
> Matt
> --
> My PGP public key ID: 0x727422b9 ( 1024-bit DSA )
>
> -----BEGIN PGPENVELOPE INFORMATION-----
>
> gpg: Signature made Mon Apr 3 04:40:44 2000 PDT using DSA key ID 727422B9
> gpg: requesting key 727422B9 from horowitz.surfnet.nl ...
> gpg: BAD signature from "Matt Mozur <matt.mozur@flashcom.net>"
>
> -----END PGPENVELOPE INFORMATION-----
>
__ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "All of the chaos Technology Consultant | Makes perfect sense..." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Joe Diffie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1d (GNU/Linux) Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE46JNiPYrxsgmsCmoRAnUrAJwI+ZWeJkYbn4+UajPPWKvjxKMN5QCg5syJ qm2UZOxv8WAA1gWPU+GGtSE= =DFco -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----