unsuported key algorithm?

[L. Sassaman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think this has become far off the topic of GnuPG. Werner, feel free to
declare this topic dead if you so choose. :)

I'm wondering about section 7: Aggregation with independent works... does
this mean that, if the GPH were released under the GFDL, that it could be
reprinted as part of a whole, without the whole being released under the
provisions of the GFDL?

I think so...


- --Len.


On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Matt Mozur wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGPENVELOPE PROCESSED MESSAGE-----
> 
> "L. Sassaman" wrote:
> >
> > A standard copyright, as with all published books. I don't see how the GPL
> > fits in with the book publishing world...
> >
> 
> GNU has released a new license for documents, called GFDL (GNU
> Free
> Documentation License)
> 
> you can get it at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
> 
> HTH
> 
> Matt
> --
> My PGP public key ID: 0x727422b9 ( 1024-bit DSA )
> 
> -----BEGIN PGPENVELOPE INFORMATION-----
> 
> gpg: Signature made Mon Apr  3 04:40:44 2000 PDT using DSA key ID 727422B9
> gpg: requesting key 727422B9 from horowitz.surfnet.nl ...
> gpg: BAD signature from "Matt Mozur <matt.mozur@flashcom.net>"
> 
> -----END PGPENVELOPE INFORMATION-----
> 

__

L. Sassaman

System Administrator                |  "All of the chaos
Technology Consultant               |   Makes perfect sense..."
icq.. 10735603                      |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi |              --Joe Diffie



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1d (GNU/Linux)
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.

iD8DBQE46JNiPYrxsgmsCmoRAnUrAJwI+ZWeJkYbn4+UajPPWKvjxKMN5QCg5syJ
qm2UZOxv8WAA1gWPU+GGtSE=
=DFco
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----