Unidentified subject!

L. Sassaman rabbi@quickie.net
Wed, 19 Apr 2000 03:12:54 -0700 (PDT)

Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Michael Stevens wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:04:35AM -0700, L. Sassaman wrote:
> > > Well, the other thing I've been wondering about is, why is it legal to
> > > export signed messages in the US - Isn't that a violation as well?
> > No. That would make no sense at all. it has always been legal to
> > "export" signed or encrypted messages.
> You say that like encryption related laws are usually sensible.
Laugh. True enough. But you can sort of stretch your mind to somewhat understand the idea that allowing crypto programs to be exported would be prohibited. But having a signed message doesn't give the individual any benefit if he doesn't have the technology already. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | Technology Consultant | [This space for rent] icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE4/YauPYrxsgmsCmoRAvVYAKDaMEAwSlsVAqeyoK4jILkpD2UFjwCg0M9Q ilxuO0DqkuTXeS/QDd4GIjA= =JvU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----