valid sig, invlalid key?
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:53:06 -0400
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 05:06:36PM -0700, L. Sassaman wrote:
-snip PGP gripes about unknown validity of signator's key, \
but, GnuPG does not-
> That means that the key that produced the signature is not known to be
> valid. In otherwords, it isn't signed be a trusted key.
GnuPG not griping this way is not bad policy, I gather. PGP's action
here is considered hand-holding and a bit annoying, yes?
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to email@example.com