Sign test (was: Netscape GPG)

[Lars Hecking]

Werner Koch writes:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
> 
> >  signed mails is that your message was multipart/mixed, and maybe
> 
> Which is correct
> 
> >  the list software has problems with that. Or there was some broken
> >  MTA in the path.
> 
> This maybe the problem,  so we do another test here.  The difference
> to Walter's message is that this one is composed using Mutt 1.1 where
> walter used 1.0 and of course it is a DSA key. 
> 
> Let's have some Umlaute äöü to force quoted-printable, but I think 
> Mutt does this anyway.

 Reading with mutt-1.1.1i and gpg-1.0.1, here is gpg's output on your
 message:

[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Jan  7 12:42:48 2000) --]
gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 07 12:15:58 2000 GMT using DSA key ID 621CC013
gpg: requesting key 621CC013 from blackhole.pca.dfn.de ...
gpg: key 621CC013: invalid subkey binding
gpg: key 621CC013: no valid user IDs
gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:           w/o user IDs: 1
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
[-- End of PGP output --]

 and this is from mutt's attachment "v"iew

      1 <no description>                            [multipa/mixed, 7bit, 5.1K] 
      2 |-><no description>              [text/plain, quoted, iso-8859-1, 0.6K] 
      3 `->8bit-in-header.c                  [text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 4.2K] 
      4 <no description>                       [applica/pgp-signat, 7bit, 0.2K]