GnuPG: what email client should i use?

Billy Donahue billy@dadadada.net
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:28:28 -0400 (EDT)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Stefan Suurmeijer wrote:


> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Stefan Suurmeijer <stefan@symbolica.nl>
> To: Lars Hecking <lhecking@nmrc.ie>
> Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: GnuPG: what email client should i use?
> Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:39:35 +0200
> Resent-From: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> >
> > > has anybody got experiences with different email
> > > clients for X?
> > >
> > > the trouble is that i found different clients
> > > supporting pgp but i can't make them work (even if
> > > i use gpgpgp) with gpg.
> > >
> > > any suggestions?
> >
> > I generally stay away from GUI mail user agents. Of the text mode
> > MUAs, mutt supports gpg out of the box. Pine can use gpg too, I think.
> >
> >
>
> just get pgp4pine from linuxberg or directly from the homesite
> (http://pgp4pine.flatline.de). It's easy to configure and works with both
> PGP and GPG. And pine is (in my humble opinion) still the best UNIX mail
> client.
http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net is also quite nice.. I thought it was much easier to set up than pgp4pine, and has a more powerful interface. - -- "The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk." Billy Donahue <mailto:billy@dadadada.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.8.11 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQE5fc5B+2VvpwIZdF0RAtd7AJ9ITqBJS21SoNH5YsEZisyhLtqCFQCdFx0E ndGLb23LAFtrk5es2YB9NBs= =D355 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----