Thu, 22 Jun 2000 17:09:33 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, L. Sassaman wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, J. Goodleaf wrote:
> > You need to acquire pgp4pine.
> pgpenvelope is far, far better.
You're right.. I'm a happy pgp4pine user, but I like what
I see here with pgpenvelope...
My biggest problem with pgp4pine is that it isn't at all smart about
keys (like mine) with multiple uids, and it pretty much ignores
signatures on keys... I think I'll give this a shot and see if its
"The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk."
Billy Donahue <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----