Problems with an expired key...

[Horacio MG]

El mié, 15 de mar de 2000, a las 04:52:23 -0800, L. Sassaman dijo:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> 
> > > And while you're fussing with config files, fix your email client not to
> > > use PGP/MIME. :)	
> > Hey, I'd think that on this list of all places PGP/MIME would be well
> > regarded.
> 
> It is my opinion that PGP/MIME should not exist. Most of the list members
> probably dislike it as well, though I doubt many share my extreme hatred
> for it. ASCII-Armored messages are good.

PGP/MIME is no problem, may be the problem is that either pine doesn't
handle it well or you haven't configured it to handle it properly.

Mutt parses both PGP/MIME and application/pgp well, and I see no trouble
with it.

For instance, Cristopher's sig output:

[-- Salida de PGP a continuación (tiempo actual: Thu Mar 16 09:26:04
2000) --]
gpg: Signature made jue 16 mar 2000 01:41:14 CET using DSA key ID
D843F946
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
[-- Fin de salida PGP --]

[-- Lo siguiente esta firmado con PGP/MIME --]


whereas yours:

[-- Salida de PGP a continuación (tiempo actual: Thu Mar 16 09:30:12
2000) --]
gpg: Signature made jue 16 mar 2000 01:52:33 CET using DSA key ID
09AC0A6A
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

[-- Fin de salida PGP --]

[-- PRINCIPIO DEL MENSAJE FIRMADO CON PGP --]


So, where's the big difference?  Your mailer could make the difference,
of course :)


-- 
Horacio					Anno MMDCCLIII aUC
homega@ciberia.es			Valencia - ESPAÑA
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = F4EE AE5E 2F01 0DB3 62F2  A9F4 AD31 7093 4233 7AE6