gnupg for windows

[L. Sassaman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 20 May 2000, Horacio MG wrote:

> El vie, 19 de may de 2000, a las 08:51:21 -0700, L. Sassaman dijo:
> > On Fri, 19 May 2000, Carlos Colombo wrote:
> > 
> > It is my understanding that GnuPG is not stable or secure under
> > Windows presently. Based on the information that I have, I'd not
> > recommed you try it.
> 
> Just curious here.  What exactly is that information about?
> 
> In any case, it's funny talking about the stability and/or security of a
> program for an O.S. which usually blames programs for its own failures
> (discharge: by no means am I implying that you don't have a point here).

This is a discussion I really don't want to through myself into. If you
ask Werner nicely, I am sure he can tell you the state of development for
Win32...


- --Len.

__

L. Sassaman

System Administrator                |  "It's a nice day 
Technology Consultant               |   to start again."
icq.. 10735603                      |    
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi |        --Billy Idol







-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.

iD8DBQE5JrYUPYrxsgmsCmoRAmmjAJ49ui2WVi5kDNZ8NS+R4YMtbqLidgCeOWUF
DCStbehKl8vbvs6mSOMT0VM=
=UCmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----