gnupg for windows

L. Sassaman
Sat, 20 May 2000 08:58:05 -0700 (PDT)

Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 20 May 2000, Horacio MG wrote:

> El vie, 19 de may de 2000, a las 08:51:21 -0700, L. Sassaman dijo:
> > On Fri, 19 May 2000, Carlos Colombo wrote:
> >
> > It is my understanding that GnuPG is not stable or secure under
> > Windows presently. Based on the information that I have, I'd not
> > recommed you try it.
> Just curious here. What exactly is that information about?
> In any case, it's funny talking about the stability and/or security of a
> program for an O.S. which usually blames programs for its own failures
> (discharge: by no means am I implying that you don't have a point here).
This is a discussion I really don't want to through myself into. If you ask Werner nicely, I am sure he can tell you the state of development for Win32... - --Len. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "It's a nice day Technology Consultant | to start again." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger:// | --Billy Idol -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE5JrYUPYrxsgmsCmoRAmmjAJ49ui2WVi5kDNZ8NS+R4YMtbqLidgCeOWUF DCStbehKl8vbvs6mSOMT0VM= =UCmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----