gnupg for windows
Sat, 20 May 2000 08:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Horacio MG wrote:
> El vie, 19 de may de 2000, a las 08:51:21 -0700, L. Sassaman dijo:
> > On Fri, 19 May 2000, Carlos Colombo wrote:
> > It is my understanding that GnuPG is not stable or secure under
> > Windows presently. Based on the information that I have, I'd not
> > recommed you try it.
> Just curious here. What exactly is that information about?
> In any case, it's funny talking about the stability and/or security of a
> program for an O.S. which usually blames programs for its own failures
> (discharge: by no means am I implying that you don't have a point here).
This is a discussion I really don't want to through myself into. If you
ask Werner nicely, I am sure he can tell you the state of development for
System Administrator | "It's a nice day
Technology Consultant | to start again."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Billy Idol
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----